1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 67 Wn.
  5. 67 Wn. App. 259 (1992)
 

STATE v. WEESE

Nos. 13783-6-II; 14011-0-II.

67 Wn. App. 259 (1992)

834 P.2d 1099

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DAVID W. WEESE, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL K. WALKER, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

August 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott J. Bougher and Wecker, Holman, for appellants (appointed counsel for appeal).

C. Danny Clem, Prosecuting Attorney, and Pamela B. Loginsky, Deputy, for respondent.

THOMPSON, J.*

David Weese and Daniel Walker appeal from the portions of their sentences which require the court to notify the Department of Licensing that they have been convicted of being minors in possession of intoxicating liquor, upon which notification their driving privileges will be revoked without a hearing. They contend that the notification and revocation statutes violate equal protection because they apply only to juveniles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases