STATE v. CAPACI


260 N.J. Super. 65 (1992)

615 A.2d 275

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VINCENT CAPACI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 30, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karas, Kilstein, Hirschklau, Feitlin, Kopf & Baime, attorneys for appellant (Andrew J. Karas on the brief).

Ralph L. DeLuccia, Jr., Corporation Counsel, attorney for respondents the State of New Jersey and the City of Paterson (Robert Brigliadoro, Assistant Corporation Counsel, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN and MUIR, Jr.


The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.

Defendant Vincent Capaci and his wife owned residential rental property in Paterson. The record does not show whether it was a single residence or a multi-unit building. They sold the property in 1989, while it was occupied by a tenant or tenants, without complying with Article 29 of Chapter 13 of Paterson's codified ordinances. Defendant was found guilty in the municipal court and then in the Law Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases