RAGUSA v. LAW DEPT.


166 Misc.2d 157 (1992)

634 N.Y.S.2d 657

In the Matter of Anthony Ragusa, Jr., Doing Business as The Stereo Advantage, Petitioner, v. New York State Department of Law et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

November 17, 1992


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, New York City (Kathie Ann Whipple and Vincent Leong of counsel), for respondents. Saperston & Day, P. C., Buffalo (Patricia Gillen of counsel), for petitioner. Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City (Randolph W. Tritell of counsel), for Matsushita Electric Corporation of America. McDermott, Will & Emery, New York City (Lawrence I. Fox of counsel), for unnamed national retailers.


MARTIN B. STECHER, J.

This is a motion "for an order and judgment * * * granting renewal or rehearing of this petition on the additional facts submitted". (If "rehearing" is intended to mean reargument, it is denied. The court will treat this solely as a motion for renewal.)

With considerable justification the petitioner, who opposes this motion for renewal, points out that every single "fact" alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases