1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 260 N.J.
  5. 260 N.J. Super. 58 (1992)
 

A.C. CONST. CO., INC. v. KEHOE

260 N.J. Super. 58 (1992)

615 A.2d 271

A.C. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. INEKE KEHOE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald J. Cappuccio argued the cause for appellant.

George M. Shumsky argued the cause for respondent (Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys; Mr. Shumsky and William B. Scatchard, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BRODY and THOMAS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals, on leave granted, from an interlocutory order that (1) invalidated its contractor's lien based upon a filed construction contract and (2) extinguished "all derivative stop notices."1 Plaintiff is a building contractor; defendant is the owner of real property on which plaintiff constructed a substantial part of defendant's new home. The underlying dispute is

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases