1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 64 Wn.
  5. 64 Wn. App. 235 (1992)
 

JANE DOE v. BOEING COMPANY

No. 26231-9-I.

64 Wn. App. 235 (1992)

823 P.2d 1159

JANE DOE, Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order March 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Washington; Lonnie G. Davis, Disabilities Law Project; and Kelby D. Fletcher (of Peterson, Bracelin, Young, Putra, Fletcher & Zeder, Inc., P.S.,) for appellant.

Valerie L. Hughes, Rex D. Berry, and Perkins Coie, for respondent.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 20, 1992.]

AGID, J.

Jane Doe appeals the dismissal of her complaint for employment discrimination on the basis of handicap, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that The Boeing Company's (Boeing) accommodation of her condition was reasonable. Respondent Boeing cross-appeals the trial court's characterization of gender dysphoria1 as a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases