STATE v. HOLLOMAN

No. 66,848

17 Kan. App. 2d 279 (1992)

837 P.2d 826

STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. EDWARD E. HOLLOMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed July 31, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen Pedigo, legal intern, Elizabeth Sterns, assistant appellate defender, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, for the appellant.

M. Jennifer Brunetti, assistant district attorney, Gene M. Olander, district attorney, and Robert T. Stephan, attorney general, for the appellee.

Before BRAZIL, P.J., DAVIS, J., and KAREN M. HUMPHREYS, District Judge, assigned.


Petition for review denied 251 Kan. 940 (1992).

DAVIS, J.:

The defendant, Edward E. Holloman, appeals his robbery conviction, claiming that the court should have excluded eyewitness identification testimony because the police procedures used were impermissibly suggestive. He also contends that the failure to give a lesser included offense instruction and a burden of proof instruction on alibi defense requires reversal. Finally, he claims the evidence is insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases