IN THE MATTER OF CARL HARTMANN AND STEVEN SMITH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued June 2, 1992.
Decided July 1, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sydney V. Stoldt, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Stoldt & Horan, attorneys; Cathy J. Pollak, on the brief).
Philip De Vencentes argued the cause for respondent Carl Hartmann (Galantucci & Patuto, attorneys).
William J. Berman argued the cause for respondent Steven R. Smith (Rosen and Berman, attorneys).
Michael S. Bokar, Senior Deputy Attorney General, submitted a statement in lieu of brief for the Merit System Board (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).
Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.
This appeal arises out of a disciplinary proceeding against two police officers employed by the Village of Ridgewood (Village). The Village alleged that the officers, Carl Hartmann and Steven Smith, and other Village police officers, were attending a class on January 5, 1990, that they left the class early, without permission, and that they went to a nearby...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
