1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 174 A.D.2d
  5. 174 A.D.2d 111 (1992)
 

PEOPLE v. BOLDEN

174 A.D.2d 111 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bolden, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 21, 1992

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Geoffrey Goldberg for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney (Jay M. Cohen, Richard T. Faughnan and Lindsay Brown of counsel), for respondent.

SULLIVAN, EIBER and COPERTINO, JJ., concur.

THOMPSON, J. P.

The People are not obligated to prove that they have exercised "due diligence" in attempting to locate a defendant for whom a bench warrant has been issued (see, People v Garrett, 171 A.D.2d 153; CPL 30.30 [4] [c]). Today, we hold that the People need only demonstrate that a bench warrant has been issued in order to exclude delays attributable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases