COHEN v. COHEN


258 N.J. Super. 24 (1992)

609 A.2d 57

NORMAN COHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WENDY COHEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 29, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald M. Abramson argued the cause for appellant (Kleeblatt, Galler & Abramson, attorneys; Ronald M. Abramson, on the brief).

Donald Friedman argued the cause for respondent (Donald Friedman, attorney; Donald Friedman and Robert A. Vort, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, GRUCCIO and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

This appeal arises in the aftermath of a bitter divorce and custody battle between defendant, Dr. Wendy Cohen, and plaintiff, Dr. Norman Cohen. Defendant Wendy Cohen established an account for her daughter under the New Jersey Uniform Gifts to Minors Act ("UGMA"), N.J.S.A. 46:38-13 et seq., naming herself as custodian. Plaintiff Norman Cohen, on behalf of his daughter, contested some of the custodian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases