JERSEY CITY POLICE v. JERSEY CITY


257 N.J. Super. 6 (1992)

607 A.2d 1314

JERSEY CITY POLICE OFFICERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 3, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Corporation Counsel, attorney for appellant (Paul W. Mackey, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).

Schneider, Cohen, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys for respondent (David S. Solomon, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SHEBELL and SKILLMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This controversy arises out of a collective negotiation agreement between defendant Jersey City and plaintiff Jersey City Police Officers Benevolent Association (POBA), which represents all Jersey City police officers under the grade of sergeant. Jersey City appeals from an order of the Chancery Division denying it relief from an earlier consent judgment by which it had agreed to the confirmation of an arbitrator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases