1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 63 Ohio
  5. 63 Ohio St.3d 198 (1992)
 

VOINOVICH v. FERGUSON

No. 91-1882.

63 Ohio St.3d 198 (1992)

VOINOVICH ET AL. v. FERGUSON ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, N. Victor Goodman, James F. DeLeone, Orla E. Collier III and Mark D. Tucker, for plaintiffs.

Faruki, Gilliam & Ireland, Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., Ann Wightman and Laura A. Sanom, for defendants Thomas E. Ferguson and Barney Quilter.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Kathleen McDonald O'Malley and Theresa Rittinger Schaefer, for defendant Lee Fisher.

Lewis & Spencer and Scott W. Spencer, for defendant Charles E. Henry.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Richard G. Reichel, for defendant Grace Drake.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs and defendants and counterclaimants Henry and Drake raise the issue of the constitutionality of Senate District 32. It is agreed that the district does not meet the population requirements of Section 4 of Article XI, Ohio Constitution, as its population is only 308,942 persons, 93.99 percent of a senate ratio of representation (328,700 persons). Section 4 prohibits creation of a district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases