HUSTON v. LADNER

No. 91-1515.

973 F.2d 1564 (1992)

James S. HUSTON and Herman Oppermann, Appellants, v. Robert C. LADNER, Robert E. Bird and Karl Hardman, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Haley, Jr., Fish & Neave, New York City, argued, for appellants. With him on the brief, was Denise L. Loring.

Jorge A. Goldstein, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellees. With him on the brief, was Steven Kreiss.

Before NEWMAN, PLAGER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.


LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Huston appeals from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision in Patent Interference 102,562 granting summary judgment in favor of Ladner. Because we find that Huston failed to show that the Board abused its discretion in holding that the appellant did not show "good cause" under 37 C.F.R. § 1.617(b) to justify submission of additional evidence, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The present dispute involves an interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases