1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 224 Conn.
  5. 224 Conn. 29 (1992)
 

CALFEE v. USMAN

(14541)

224 Conn. 29 (1992)

ELIZABETH CALFEE v. AHMED USMAN

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released October 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin M. Looney, with whom, on the brief, was John A. Keyes, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Edward V. Walsh, with whom were Robert M. Wechsler and, on the brief, Catherine N. Anderson, for the appellee (defendant).

PETERS, C. J., CALLAHAN, BORDEN, BERDON and NORCOTT, JS.

PETERS, C. J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, in a tort action, two prejudgment remedy statutes, General Statutes §§ 52-278c and 52-278d,1 are unconstitutionally vague as a matter of law. The plaintiff, Elizabeth Calfee, made an application for a prejudgment remedy in conjunction with her complaint that the defendant, Ahmed Usman, had negligently operated his automobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases