U.S. v. DISCHNER

Nos. 89-30333, 89-30334.

974 F.2d 1502 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis M. DISCHNER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl W. MATHISEN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 3, 1992.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing September 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Pope, Wagstaff, Pope & Clocksin, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant-appellant Dischner.

Stephen F. Frost, Bellevue, Wash., for defendant-appellant Mathisen.

Karen L. Loeffler, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: TANG, REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges


As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc September 11, 1992.

ORDER

The opinion filed April 3, 1992 (960 F.2d 870) is amended as follows:

[Editor's Note: These changes have been incorporated into the published opinion.]

With the above amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases