1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 958 F.2d
  5. 958 F.2d 1514 (1992)
 

TAFFET v. SOUTHERN CO.

Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452.

958 F.2d 1514 (1992)

M.R. TAFFET and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and all of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and other Entities, other than the Defendants, who are Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN CO., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees. Frederick Rodgers CARR, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN COMPANY, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eddie Leitman, Andrew P. Campbell, S. Lynne Stephens, Leitman, Siegal, Payne & Campbell, P.C., Birmingham, Ala., Richard H. Gill, J. Fairley McDonald, III, Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John A. Boudet, Jerry R. Linscott, Baker & Hostetler, Orlando, Fla., for Taffett & Fierman.

Andrew M. Scherffius, Andrew M. Scherffius, P.C., A. Timothy Jones, Joseph C. Freeman, Jack N. Sibley, Freeman & Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., for Taffet, et al.

Larry Moffett, Jackson Henderson Chiles, III, Daniel, Coker, Horton and Bell, P.A., Jackson, Miss., for M.R. Taffett, et al.

M. Roland Nachman, Jr., T.W. Thagard, Jr., Maury D. Smith, John P. Scott, Jr., Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, Ala., for Alabama Power.

James E. Joiner, Hugh M. Davenport, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Co.

M. Robert Thornton, Michael C. Russ, King & Spaulding, Atlanta, Ga., for Arthur Andersen & Co.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 6, 1991, 11th Cir., 1991, 930 F.2d 847)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases