1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 63 Ohio
  5. 63 Ohio St.3d 182 (1992)
 

STATE, EX REL. HUNT, v. THOMPSON

No. 90-1817.

63 Ohio St.3d 182 (1992)

THE STATE, EX REL. HUNT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THOMPSON, JUDGE; PIGMAN ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Paxton II & Associates and Robert C. Paxton II, for appellants.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Alan L. Briggs and Michael W. Pettit, for appellee Pigman.

Faruki, Gilliam & Ireland and Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., for appellee Kegerreis.

Per Curiam.

The Hunts argue that Thompson is without jurisdiction whatsoever to act and that the appellate court should have issued the writ. Pigman and Kegerreis contend that the Hunts have an adequate remedy at law by filing a second notice of dismissal.

According to Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv., Office of Collective Bargaining v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 54 Ohio St.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases