1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 991 F.2d
  5. 991 F.2d 1452 (1992)
 

U.S. v. BRUMEL-ALVAREZ

Nos. 89-50412, 89-50415, 89-50423, 89-50426, 89-50431, 89-50479, 89-50480.

991 F.2d 1452 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Manuel BRUMEL-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efren MENDEZ-DUENAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario VARGAS-BRUUN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge CARRANZA-PENICHE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando Antonio AYALA-JUSTINIANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge ROMAN-SALAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo GIRON-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 29, 1992.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing April 22, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Crowley, San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellant Brumel-Alvarez.

Barbara L. Davis, San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellant Mendez-Duenas.

Gerald T. McFadden, Solana Beach, CA, for defendant-appellant Vargas-Bruun.

Carolyn Chapman, San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellant Carranza-Peniche.

Cynthia G. Aaron and Ezekiel E. Cortez, Aaron & Cortez, San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellant Ayala-Justiniano.

Rene Sotorrio, Coconut Grove, FL, for defendant-appellant Roman-Salas.

Elizabeth A. Barranco, El Cajon, CA, for defendant-appellant Giron-Ortiz.

Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: POOLE, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc April 22, 1993.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The opinion filed on September 29, 1992, is amended as follows:

[Editor's Note: Amendments have been incorporated within published opinion.]

Judges Kozinski and Leavy have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases