U.S. v. GENNUSO

No. 91-2263.

967 F.2d 1460 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Christopher GENNUSO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 23, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Plotsky, Albuquerque, N.M., for defendant-appellant.

David N. Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Don J. Svet, U.S. Atty., Robert J. Baca, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ANDERSON and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, District Judge.


EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we revisit the issue of how to measure "loss" caused by fraud under the Sentencing Guidelines. Appellant Richard C. Gennuso was convicted of fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. On appeal, he argues that the district court calculated loss incorrectly, resulting in a longer sentence than he deserved. Because we conclude that the district court calculated the loss correctly, we affirm.

Gennuso and a business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases