IN RE DECKLER

No. 92-1110.

977 F.2d 1449 (1992)

In re Harry C. DECKLER.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined November 25, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred S. Lockwood, Lockwood, Alex, Fitzgibbon & Cummings, of Chicago, Ill., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Raymond M. Mehler.

Fred E. McKelvey, Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for the appellee. With him on the brief were Richard E. Schafer and Jameson Lee.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.


Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined November 25, 1992.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), is whether the Board correctly ruled that the losing party in an interference proceeding was not entitled to a patent covering claims that that party admits are patentably indistinguishable from the claim involved in the interference. We affirm.

I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases