1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 172 Wis.2d
  5. 172 Wis.2d 70 (1992)
 

MAAS v. ZIEGLER

No. 90-0168.

172 Wis.2d 70 (1992)

492 N.W.2d 621

(88-CV-2324.) Janet Kay MAAS, by her guardian ad litem, Richard R. Grant and Chester Maas, Plaintiffs-Respondents, SENTRY INSURANCE, a mutual company, Subrogated Plaintiff, v. Peter J. ZIEGLER, Robert A. Bong, d/b/a Robert A. Bong Excavating. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, Defendants, SENTRY INSURANCE, a mutual company, Subrogated Plaintiff, Lorene A. GRAY and Sentry Insurance, a mutual company, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners. (88-CV-3107.) Gerald A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Respondent, Joy E. TAYLOR, Jason C. Taylor and Gerald Taylor, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joan M. Taylor, Plaintiffs, SENTRY INSURANCE, a mutual company, Subrogated Plaintiff, v. Peter J. ZIEGLER, Robert A. Bong, d/b/a Robert A. Bond Excavating, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, Defendants. Lorene A. GRAY and Sentry Insurance, a mutual company, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners. (88-CV-5511.) Carol Cox, Plaintiff-Respondent, Alan Cox, Plaintiff, SENTRY INSURANCE, a mutual company, Subrogated Plaintiff, v. Peter J. ZIEGLER, Robert A. Bong, d/b/a Robert A. Bong Excavating, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, Defendants, Lorene A. GRAY and Sentry Insurance, a mutual company, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendants-appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Robert F. Johnson, Philip C. Reid and Cook & Franke, S.C., Milwaukee.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, Chester Maas, there was a brief by Richard R. Grant and Consigny, Andrews, Hemming & Grant, S.C., Janesville.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, Gerald A. Taylor, there was a brief by Kent I. Carnell and Lawton & Cates, S.C., Madison.

JON P. WILCOX, J.

This case is before the court on petition for review pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.62, Stats. Petitioners, Lorene A. Gray and Sentry Insurance (hereinafter Sentry), seek review of an unpublished court of appeals decision affirming circuit court Judge Susan Steingass's denial of their motion for summary judgment. Sentry argues that the court of appeals and trial court erred in ruling that an endorsement which removed a fellow employee exclusion from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases