1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 800 F.Supp.
  5. 800 F.Supp. 1521 (1992)
 

CHIQUITA BRANDS, INC. v. MICBRUCE, INC.

No. 1:89CV1781.

800 F.Supp. 1521 (1992)

CHIQUITA BRANDS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICBRUCE, INC. d/b/a Freshline, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

July 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen McCarron, Silver Springs, Md. and Frederick Coombs, III, Harrington, Huxley, Smith, Mitchell & Reed, Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

John Doheny, Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

MANOS, District Judge.

On September 18, 1989, plaintiffs filed the above-captioned case against multiple defendants pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act ("PACA"), 7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq., to recover funds allegedly owed to them, as commodities suppliers, from MicBruce, Inc. d/b/a Freshline ("Freshline"), a commodities broker, and from other entities named as defendants because they received monies from Freshline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases