1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 970 F.2d
  5. 970 F.2d 1316 (1992)
 

SHOFER v. HACK CO.

No. 91-1024.

970 F.2d 1316 (1992)

Richard SHOFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HACK COMPANY, Stuart Hack, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Peter Palaigos, Blum, Yumkas, Mailman, Gutman & Denick, P.A., Baltimore, Md., argued (Thomas A. Bowden, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Janet Marie Truhe, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., argued (Lee B. Zaben, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, TILLEY, District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation, and HERLONG, District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.

OPINION

HERLONG, District Judge:

Richard Shofer ("Shofer") appeals the district court's granting summary judgment in favor of The Stuart Hack Company and Stuart Hack (collectively "Hack"). Shofer sought damages from Hack for allegedly failing to give proper advice about the tax consequences of borrowing from his pension plan. The district court held that Shofer's claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases