MUNIZ v. U.S.

Nos. 91-1238, 91-1309 and 91-5069.

972 F.2d 1304 (1992)

Robert A. MUNIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. Jay E. ALBRECHT; Bert D. Alton, III; Roy L. Ashlock, Sr.; Marc Bergman; Merwyn L. Bickler; Jorge A. Blackwood; Walter Blayney, Jr.; Ervin Byler; John B. Cassidy; Eufemio R. Castillo; H.J. Chellon; Bruce A. Curry; Ralph J. Daley; Donzell Digby; James W. Doty; Carl Doty; William T. Flartey; Charles R. Ford; Richard A. Frerkes; Leo Gladu; Joseph Gomes, Jr.; Robert A. Grabendike, Jr.; Harry Halpin; Sanford Hammack; Kelly Bond Hartman; Thomas F. Holcomb; William A. Hollifield; Arthur Hopwood; Richard G. Hussung; John R. Jay; Martin L. Kimbrell; W.W. Kortum; Arthur C. Kreps; David Lathan; Joseph L. Lemar; Daniel B. Mazzaanti; David Miller; Earle P. Milligan; Glen Openshaw; John J. Ortegel; Ralph Ott; Randy T. Rail; Eugene L. Rienks; Earl J. Rosekrans; Albert Sanchez; Herbert E. Sieler; William H. Simpkinson; Edwardo Sosa; Jimmy Stansbury; James Stidham; Clayton Threewit; Almyra R. Tierney; Richard E. Weimer; Floyd G. White; William A. Williams; Norman Wolfgang; Helen L. Wood; and Wilton A. Woodall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Betty Askew; Ernest S. Blaise; Robert J. Brooks; Robert M. Burns, Jr.; John I. Carson; John Carter; Marcelo Casas; Juan C. Castro; Charles E. Collison; William E. Crum; Harold A. DeCesari; Gerald F. Emert; Michael S. Fahey; Clifton Harris; Robert Harada; Donald E. Hart, Jr.; Paul Harvey; Charles A. Holm; Modesto D. Hurtado; Calvin G. Jacobs; Richard A. King; Jerry Knox; Henry E. Lauer; Daniel Lechliter; Robert D. McCarty; William D. McCrillis; Francesca McKeown; Norberto Martinez; Gary Lee Mason; Ronald E. Miele; Gene P. Miller; Lewis M. Mitchell; Norman K. Moore; Charles G. Mullikin; Gerald E. Oakley; Basil T. Puller; Mark L. Rees; Kenneth D. Reinke; Joseph W. Robinson; Dale R. Schreiner; David W. Smith; Randall H. Spencer, Sr.; Scott H. Tufts; Robert E. Whiteside; Gerald E. Winey; Donald F. Wright; Wayne Younger; Donald Ancell; Edward A. Anderson; Oscar Q. Anloague; George C. Beach; James E. Brown; Cindy A. Carpenter; Richard S. Chiorino; George S. Clig; Tom Collilns; Lawrence E. Cook; Donald Dalton; Linda D. Duenas; Will Dumont; Timothy R. Everhart; Andy Flores; Gerald D. Fredricksen; Phillip Gago; Jeffrey Geyer; Jay Hansen; Harry W. Kowolsky; Leonardo Z. Lara; Daniel Lopez; Richard Lubniewski; Karl McGuinness; Charles E. Marshall, Jr.; Janet C. Matthews; David F. Merchant; Claude W. Minyard; Donald R. Morgan; Donald E. Motz; Paul Murphy, Jr.; Gene Needham; Robert Philips; John M. Porter, Jr.; Robert R. Powell; Dennis B. Ramsey; Curt D. Ritza; A.M. Roman; Theresa E. Stephens; Steve E. Swan; Clarence M. Tomes; Arthur A. Hernandez; Daniel J. Manriquez; William Pike; James R. Ryan; Silas Abernathy, Jr.; Fred Bauman; David R. Bedford; Bruce L. Benton; Stephen R. Blanchard; John Bonadio; Oliver L. Duckworth; James Edwards; Robert Stanley Fenton; James Galligan; Craig Hackett; Daniel J. Holley; John A. Householder; David Ireland; Herman Jackson; James T. Jackson; Michael P. Murphy; Charles Olson; Anne L. Antrim-Quistgard; Alan Hugh Renard; Fred Riske; David G. Robinson; Adrian O. Stampley; Warren Thietje; Patrick Traynor; Mark Ullom; James F. Wagner and Andrew P. Foltz, Plaintiffs, v. Constance NEWMAN, Director of Office of Personnel Management, H. Lawrence Garrett, III, Secretary, Department of Navy and United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. Scott L. ANDREEN, Rod R. Boultinghouse, Michael S. Davis, Terry L. Gram, Richard V. Jones, Benjamin Luther, Frank R. Nadolski, Eric R. Nelsen, Heiko Stopsack, Franco Stone and Richard G. Stout, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 17, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg W. Jones, Hathaway, Perrett, Webster, Powers & Chrisman, Professional Corp., Ventura, Cal., argued for plaintiffs-appellants in no. 91-1309. With him on the brief was Joseph C. Chrisman.

Scott H. Park, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for defendants-appellees in no. 91-1309. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Lourdis G. Baird, U.S. Atty. and Leon W. Weidman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Div. Also on the brief was Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Steven B. Frank, Frank & Rosen, Seattle, Wash., argued for plaintiffs-appellants in no. 91-5069.

Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Atty., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee in no. 91-5069. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen. and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief were John Belser, Dept. of the Army, Washington, D.C. and Richard McCurdy, Dept. of the Army, Fort Lewis, Washington, of counsel.

Alan C. Davis, Davis, Reno & Courtney, San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiffappellant in no. 91-1238. With him on the brief was Susan Byrnes.

Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee in no. 91-1238. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen. and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief were Kay Teeters, Dept. of the Navy, Walnut Creek, Cal., Mary Beth Vitti, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal. and Bruce I. Waxman, Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER and RADER, Circuit Judges.


CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Robert A. Muniz appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Muniz v. United States, Civ. No. 89-1894 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 4, 1991). Jay E. Albrecht et al. appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissing their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Albrecht et al. v. Horner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases