1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 972 F.2d
  5. 972 F.2d 1300 (1992)
 

ARACHNID, INC. v. MEDALIST MARKETING CORP.

91-1420.

972 F.2d 1300 (1992)

ARACHNID, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEDALIST MARKETING CORPORATION, Medalist Manufacturing Corporation and Lee Peppard, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith B. Willhelm, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, of Chicago, Ill., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James B. Muskal. Of counsel was Christopher T. Griffith.

Paul T. Meiklejohn, Seed & Berry, of Seattle, Wash., argued, for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Robert Iannucci.

Before ARCHER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Arachnid, Inc., appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington holding, inter alia, that U.S. Patent No. 4,793,618 (the '618 patent) is invalid or unenforceable and not infringed, and that the defendants (collectively Medalist) are not liable under the Washington Consumer Protection Act (WCPA). We affirm.

After the jury trial, Arachnid moved for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases