HERBSTEIN v. BRUETMAN

No. 89 Civ. 6864 (RWS).

799 F.Supp. 1450 (1992)

Diego J. HERBSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. Martin E. BRUETMAN, High Tech Medical Parks Development Corp., Ronald Tash, Douglas Kiell, Mauricio Agudelo, and Alta Technologia Medica, S.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 18, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo (Ronald E. DePetris, Seth F. Kaufman, of counsel), New York City, for plaintiff.

Bell & McGurk, Ltd. by James A. McGurk, Dennis A. Bell, Chicago, Ill., Baer Marks & Upham, of counsel by Barry J. Mandel, Peter E. Cooper, New York City, for defendants Martin E. Bruetman, High Tech Medical Parks Dev. Corp., Douglas Keill, Mauricio Agudelo and Alta Tecnologia Medica S.A.

Ronald A. Tash, pro se.


OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Martin E. Bruetman ("Bruetman"), Douglas Keill ("Keill"), Mauricio Agudelo ("Agudelo"), High Tech Medical Parks Development Corp. ("High Tech"), and Alta Tecnologia Medica, S.A. ("Alta-2"), have moved jointly for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Agudelo, Keill, and pro se Defendant Ronald Tash ("Tash") have separately moved for summary judgment. Bruetman, Keill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases