CARECCIA v. ENSTROM


174 A.D.2d 48 (1992)

Thomas J. Careccia, Respondent, v. Edwin A. Enstrom, Defendant, and County of Rockland, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

January 16, 1992


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kornfeld, Rew, Newman & Ellsworth (Frank T. Simeone of counsel), for appellant.

Bower & Gardner (Barry Viuker, Jonathan Siegal and Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

MIKOLL, J. P., YESAWICH JR., CREW III and HARVEY, JJ., concur.


CASEY, J.

At issue on this appeal is whether videotapes which result from the surveillance of a personal injury plaintiff, conducted at the direction of defense counsel after commencement of the personal injury action, are discoverable upon demand by plaintiff. The First Department has held that such material must be produced upon demand, although disclosure "may properly be delayed until the party making the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases