STATE v. McGILL

91-CR-0014-33; CA A70645.

836 P.2d 1371 (1992)

115 Or. App. 122

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Melvin Victor McGILL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Laws, Madras, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Shepard & Laws, Madras.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal possession of rented property. ORS 164.140(1)(a).1 In his fourth assignment of error, he contends that, because there is no written waiver of jury trial, under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution he is entitled to a new trial. The state concedes the error, and we accept that concession.

Defendant is a tribal Indian who lives on the Warm Springs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases