HENDGEN v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

LUBA 92-038; CA A75291.

836 P.2d 1369 (1992)

115 Or. App. 117

Hans HENDGEN and Shauna Hendgen, Petitioners, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Shonkwiler, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

David W. Anderson, Asst. County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Gloria Gardiner, Asst. County Counsel, and Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Clackamas County denied petitioner's application for a determination that they enjoy a nonconforming use for two buildings on their property and for a change of the use. LUBA affirmed. Petitioners seek review, and we reverse.

We take the facts from LUBA's opinion:

"The subject property consists of 267 acres and is zoned General Agricultural District (GAD), an exclusive farm use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases