STATE v. FRIAS

CR90-135; CA A68396.

836 P.2d 1367 (1992)

115 Or. App. 149

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael A. FRIAS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Sherman, McMinnville, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Michael M. Pacheco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

On March 30, 1990, at about 7:30 p.m., Yamhill County Sheriff's deputies Warden and Newberry stopped defendant for a speeding violation. Newberry talked to defendant about the violation and returned to the patrol car to write a citation and run a records check. Meanwhile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases