PEACOCK v. VENEER SERVICES

88-02788; CA A69400.

833 P.2d 1364 (1992)

113 Or. App. 732

In the Matter of the Compensation of James E. Peacock, Claimant. James E. PEACOCK, Petitioner, v. VENEER SERVICES and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Hooton, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore & Johnson, Eugene.

Thomas E. Ewing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Worker's Compensation Board order denying him vocational assistance benefits. The issue is whether he was properly denied vocational assistance because he cannot come to Oregon to obtain it. We affirm.

Claimant compensably injured his back in 1978. He was awarded 55% permanent partial disability and has had five back surgeries. In 1986, he negotiated a plea bargain on a criminal charge and, pursuant to the plea agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases