MEIER & FRANK CO. v. SMITH-SANDERS

89-18180; CA A69500.

836 P.2d 1359 (1992)

115 Or. App. 159

In the Matter of the Compensation of Betty J. Smith-Sanders, Claimant. MEIER & FRANK CO. and May Department Stores Company, Petitioners, v. Betty J. SMITH-SANDERS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 9, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch, MacKenzie, Healey & Wilson, P.C., Portland.

Glen H. Downs, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were J. Michael Casey and Doblie & Associates, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order by the Workers' Compensation Board holding it responsible for medical expenses associated with claimant's non-compensable injury and assessing penalties and attorney fees. We reverse on the penalties and attorney fees. Otherwise, we affirm.

The Board accepted the referee's findings. Claimant suffered a compensable back injury in June, 1988. She had returned to her job by June, 1989, working part-time, when she...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases