WILSON v. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS

WCB 89-24371; CA A69711.

833 P.2d 1362 (1992)

113 Or. App. 670

In the Matter of the Compensation of Helen M. Wilson, Claimant. Helen M. WILSON, Petitioner, v. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Hooten, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Dale C. Johnson and Malagon, Moore & Johnson, Eugene.

Richard Wm. Davis, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Stafford J. Hazelett and Davis & Bostwick, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

In this workers' compensation case, the Workers' Compensation Board upheld employer's denial, because claimant had not filed her claim on time. Claimant seeks review, and we affirm.

Claimant does not dispute the Board's findings. She worked for employer as a skoog operator, which involved light work associated with plugging knot holes in sheets of plywood. In early December, 1988, she relieved another employee on the "round table...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases