PERKINS v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A71240.

833 P.2d 1356 (1992)

113 Or. App. 709

Richard W. PERKINS, Jr., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 1, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Perkins, Jr., Salem, filed the brief pro se.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief, for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a challenge to a Board of Parole rule, OAR 255-30-010, brought under ORS 183.400(4)(b). Petitioner, an inmate at a Department of Corrections institution, argues that the Board exceeded its statutory authority by including in the rule language authorizing it to extend for 90 days the time to set a prison term hearing to obtain additional information. Petitioner asks us to declare the rule invalid.

ORS 144.120 governs the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases