RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. v. GREENWOOD

No. Civ. 4-92-2.

798 F.Supp. 1391 (1992)

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as receiver of Midwest Savings Association, F.A., Plaintiff, v. Harold GREENWOOD, Jr., John Barry, Lawrence M. Coss, Thomas P. Fitzgibbon, Sr., Susan Greenwood-Olson, F. William Johnson, John J. Kenna, Robert Mampel, J.E. Marlin, Charlotte E. Masica, Richard K. Nelson, Lloyd K. Peterson, Thomas Resch, William Sipple, Donald Snede, and Shenehon & Associates, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

July 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Eugene Yanish, John Paul Martin, Petersen, Tews & Squires, Minneapolis, Minn., Mark S. Bernstein, Ray G. Rezner, Wendi Sloane Weitman, Elyse M. Tish, Meribeth Mermall, Barack, Ferrazzano, Kirschbaum & Perlman, Chicago, Ill., April A. Breslaw, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Bruce A. Rasmussen, Scott R. Carlson, Bruce A. Rasmussen & Associates, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant John Barry.

William Richard Busch, St. Paul, Minn., for Thomas P. Fitzgibbon, Sr. and John J. Kenna.

Susan Greenwood-Olson, St. Paul, Minn., pro se.

Dylan J. McFarland, Fred Burstein, Fred Burstein & Associates, Minneapolis, Minn., for F. William Johnson.

Robert Mampel, pro se.

Steven Z. Kaplan, Wayne A. Hergott, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, Minn., for J.E. Marlin and Lloyd K. Peterson.

Richard K. Nelson, pro se.

E. Martin Stapleton, Mark Murray Nolan, Stapleton, Nolan & McCall, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant Thomas Resch.

William Sipple, pro se.

Donald Snede, pro se.

Lindsay G. Arthur, Jr., Katherine L. MacKinnon, Paula Duggan Vraa, Arthur Chapman McDonough, Kettering & Smetak, Minneapolis, Minn., for Shenehon & Associates.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) brought this action against sixteen defendants associated with Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association (Midwest). The RTC asserts claims of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, gross negligence and unjust enrichment against the defendant directors and officers. Various defendants have raised affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases