HO v. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF LAURELHURST

8912-07667; CA A68754.

840 P.2d 1340 (1992)

116 Or. App. 115

Ying Loi HO and Tony Ying-Hoo Ho, Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF LAURELHURST, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 4, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 16, 1992.

Review Denied January 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Folawn, Portland, argued the cause, for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs, were Martin W. Jaqua and Holmes & Folawn and Thomas W. McPherson and Rankin, Mersereau, Portland.

David R. Nepom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondents-cross-appellants.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs are the vendee under a land sale contract and his assignee. They brought this action for rescission of the contract after a declaration of forfeiture by defendant vendor. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs. The claim for rescission is equitable, and we review de novo. Gardner v. Meiling, 280 Or. 665, 671, 572 P.2d 1012 (1977).

In 1979...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases