1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 840 P.2d
  5. 840 P.2d 1335 (1992)
 

STATE v. HENRY

91CR1732FE; CA A74189.

840 P.2d 1335 (1992)

116 Or. App. 138

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William James HENRY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Verden L. Hockett, Jr., Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Paul Migchelbrink, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), assigning error to the court's denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

At trial, the state proved that defendant possessed a small quantity, less than 10 milligrams, of methamphetamine. Defendant argues that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases