MEYER v. YOUNGQUIST

91C-735123; CA A70332.

833 P.2d 1315 (1992)

113 Or. App. 592

David P. MEYER, Respondent, v. Dean YOUNGQUIST, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 24, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice L. Russell, II and Churchill, Leonard, Brown, Lincoln, Lodine & Hendrie, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

David P. Meyer, pro se.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in plaintiff's favor. He assigns as error the court's granting of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment only if no genuine issue of material fact exists. See ORCP 47 C; Seeborg v. General Motors Corp., 284 Or. 695, 699, 588 P.2d 1100<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases