PORTLAND v. ONE 1973 CHEVROLET CORVETTE

90-C-712825; CA A70609.

833 P.2d 1285 (1992)

113 Or. App. 469

CITY OF PORTLAND, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Appellant, v. ONE 1973 CHEVROLET CORVETTE CONVERTIBLE L82, OR LIC 3TT3V; Hitachi Portable Telephone, Defendants in Rem, and Noe Tovar Gonzales, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 10, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy Holmes Hehn, Deputy Dist. Atty., Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Multnomah County Dist. Atty's Office, Portland.

Constance Crooker, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

City of Portland (City) appeals from a judgment in favor of claimant in a civil forfeiture action. Or.Laws 1989, ch. 791.1 Claimant contends that the appeal is moot.

City seized claimant's car and cellular telephone after he was arrested for possession of a controlled substance. After he received a notice of seizure for forfeiture, claimant filed a claim for the return of the property. The trial court held for claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases