1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 826 P.2d
  5. 826 P.2d 1288 (1992)
 

RICE v. HILL CITY STOCK YARDS CO.

No. 18949.

826 P.2d 1288 (1992)

121 Idaho 576

Gwinn F. RICE and Lena Rice, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HILL CITY STOCK YARDS COMPANY, a defunct Idaho corporation; the unknown heirs and devisees of R.H. Bennett, Joe Urquidi, P.M. Gandiago, Joe Darrianaga and James Farmer, said named individuals being the last directors of Hill City Stock Yards Company and all of said individuals being deceased; E.R. Hanford, if living; the unknown heirs and devisees of E.R. Hanford, if deceased; A.C. Chipman and Rosa B. Chipman, if living; the unknown heirs and devisees of A.C. Chipman and Rosa B. Chipman, if deceased; Camas Prairie Development Company, a defunct Idaho corporation; the unknown last directors, if living, and if deceased, the unknown heirs and devisees of said last directors of Camas Prairie Development Company, a defunct Idaho corporation; County of Camas, State of Idaho, a body politic corporate; all of the unknown owners and claimants of the following described real property situate in Camas County, State of Idaho, to wit: Defendants, and Faulkner Land and Livestock, Inc.; Charles J. Olson; Robert F. Bennett; Hammet Livestock Company, a corporation; Dennis Strom; and Adeline M. Urquidi, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, March 1991 Term.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ling, Nielsen & Robinson, Rupert, for plaintiffs-appellants. Roger D. Ling, argued.

Rosholt, Robertson & Tucker, Twin Falls, for defendants-respondents. Gary D. Slette, argued.

ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Gwinn and Lena Rice brought this action against defendants Hill City Stock Yards, Faulkner Land & Livestock, Inc., and others, seeking to quiet title in certain real property in Camas County, Idaho. The trial court denied plaintiffs' claim to the property. Plaintiffs appealed this decision, and the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases