MERZLAK v. PURCELL

No. 91-357.

830 P.2d 1278 (1992)

Joe R. MERZLAK and Janene L. Merzlak, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. James E. PURCELL and Henningson & Purcell, a Montana professional services corporation, Defendants, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided February 13, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Gould, James M. Driscoll, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs and appellants.

R.D. Corette and William M. O'Leary, Corette, Pohlman, Allen, Black & Carlson, Butte, for defendants, respondents and cross-appellants.


WEBER, Justice.

Appellants Joe R. Merzlak and Janene L. Merzlak (Merzlaks) brought an action for legal malpractice against their attorney James E. Purcell and his law firm Henningsen & Purcell, P.C. (Purcell). The Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, found Purcell negligently represented the Merzlaks, ordered the return of $12,398.20 in attorney's fees together with interest, and denied punitive damages. Merzlaks appeal the amount of the judgment....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases