U.S. v. FULFORD

No. 92-1018.

980 F.2d 1110 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James FULFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colin S. Bruce, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Springfield, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Paul M. Brayman, Chicago, Ill., Michael B. Metnick, Richard D. Frazier (argued), Metnick, Barewin & Wise, Springfield, Ill., for defendant-appellant.

Before CUMMINGS and MANION, Circuit Judges, and ZAGEL, District Judge.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

James Fulford appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), contending that the district court erred at trial in allowing the admission of alleged hearsay testimony, as well as other allegedly irrelevant and prejudicial testimony. He also appeals the $5,000 fine imposed during sentencing as improper in light of facts of record indicating his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases