U.S. v. SMITHERMAN

No. 91-7331 Non-Argument Calendar.

956 F.2d 1131 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald T. SMITHERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 31, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Lloyd Copeland, Claek, Deen & Copeland, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Richard Moore, U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in this case is whether the appellant may raise under the plain error doctrine a sentencing error which was not objected to at the time of sentencing.

At sentencing, the district court followed to the letter the procedure mandated by this court in United States v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1097 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 275, 112 L.Ed.2d 230 (1990), and the appellant did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases