1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 975 F.2d
  5. 975 F.2d 1105 (1992)
 

FLRA v. U.S. DEPT. OF DEFENSE

Nos. 90-4722, 90-4775.

975 F.2d 1105 (1992)

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, WASHINGTON, D.C., and Navy CBC Exchange, Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, Mississippi, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE, DALLAS, TEXAS, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pamela P. Johnson, William E. Persina, Sol., William R. Tobey, Deputy Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Elaine Kaplan, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Nat. Treasury Employees Union.

Stuart Kirsch, Asst. Gen. Counsel-Litigation, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, College Park, Ga., Mark D. Roth, Gen. Counsel Asst. Federal Defender, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for intervenor A.F.G.

Sandra W. Simon, Leonard Schaitman, William Kanter, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Robert Edwards, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Chief, Labor/Workers Compensation Law Branch, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Dallas, Tex., for respondents.

Before KING, JOHNSON, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 7, 1992.

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

In these two cases two labor organizations who represent federal employees requested that the federal agencies disclose to the unions the names and home addresses of all of the employees in the relevant bargaining units. The employer agencies refused, and the unions filed unfair labor practice charges with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA). The FLRA ordered the employers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases