1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 974 F.2d
  5. 974 F.2d 1099 (1992)
 

HENDRICKS v. VASQUEZ

No. 91-16631.

974 F.2d 1099 (1992)

Edgar M. HENDRICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel VASQUEZ, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 2, 1992.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Goodman, Topel & Goodman, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

Dane R. Gillette, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents-appellees.

Before GOODWIN, CANBY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

In petitioning this court for a writ of habeas corpus, Edgar M. Hendricks alleges numerous constitutional errors with respect to his conviction for murder, sentence of death, and habeas corpus appeal. All but one of Hendricks' claims are unavailing. Because we find that the district court erred in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing with respect to Hendricks' ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we remand this case for a hearing on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases