HERTZ v. MOSES

No. S-4250.

823 P.2d 1247 (1992)

Sidney R. HERTZ, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. Charles MOSES, Individually and in his capacity as Regional Director; Richard C. Shoeffel, Individually and in his capacity as Superintendent; Michael O'Shea, Individually and in his capacity as Chairperson, Disciplinary Committee, Spring Creek Correctional Center, Department of Corrections for the State of Alaska, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

January 17, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney R. Hertz, pro se.

John K. Bodick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage, Charles E. Cole, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellees.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The failure to denote the incident report as either disciplinary or informational did not violate appellant's due process rights as he had adequate notice of the disciplinary hearing. Similarly, the failure to call Mr. Easter to testify as to why the incident report was not so denoted was not a due process violation because Easter's testimony on this point was irrelevant to any substantive issue. The failure of the appellees to record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases