U.S. v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

Civ. A. No. 90-7468.

790 F.Supp. 1255 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Rohm and Haas Delaware Valley Inc., Chemical Properties, Inc. and Bristol Township Authority.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

April 24, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Debra L.W. Cohn, James G. Sheehan, U.S. Atty.'s Office, Philadelphia, Pa., Richard B. Stewart, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Environment and Natural Resources Div., Michael D. McIntyre, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environmental and Enforcement Section, Washington, D.C., for the U.S.

James P. Kimmel, Jr., David Richman, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Rohm and Haas Co., and Rohm & Haas Delaware Valley, Inc.

Philip L. Hinerman, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Chemical Properties, Inc.

Richard M. Snyder, Begley, Carlin & Mandio, Langhorne, Pa., for Bristol Township Authority.


DECISION UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 52(a)

LUDWIG, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), to recover EPA oversight costs incurred in substantial part prior to an administrative consent order entered into under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.1 Jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases