THWEATT v. HOMMEL

No. 27689-1-I.

67 Wn. App. 135 (1992)

834 P.2d 1058

RUBY THWEATT, Respondent, v. ROBERT HOMMEL, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve H. Demarest and Demarest & Associates, for appellant.

Richard R. Beresford and Beresford, Booth, Baronsky & Trompeter, for respondent.


KENNEDY, J.

Robert Hommel appeals an award of usury penalties equal to the principal balance due from Ruby Thweatt on a $30,000 promissory note and the trial court's judgment requiring him to repay the interest he had received and to pay Thweatt's attorney fees incurred in pursuit of her usury claim. Because we conclude that the loan qualified for the business purpose exemption provided by RCW 19.52.080, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of Hommel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases