U.S. v. ORBINO

No. 91-10179.

981 F.2d 1035 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferdinand Tafallia ORBINO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ferdinand Tafallia Orbino, pro se.

Thomas Muehleck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, HA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:

This case calls on us to decide whether the Speedy Trial Act's 30-day clock begins to run when a defendant, under suspicion of a crime for which he is later convicted, is in the meantime arrested on an unrelated charge. We agree with the district court that it does not, and affirm appellant Orbino's conviction.1

I

On December 23, 1989, Orbino...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases