1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 833 P.2d
  5. 833 P.2d 1182 (1992)
 

LOVERIN v. DEBUSK

No. 13630.

833 P.2d 1182 (1992)

114 N.M. 1

Janis LOVERIN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Gary DEBUSK, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

February 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Kastler, John William Clever, Kastler and Kamm, Raton, for petitioner-appellee.

Morris Stagner, Clovis, Winston Roberts-Hohl, Santa Fe, for respondent-appellant.

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Appellate counsel, Winston Roberts-Hohl, was ordered to show cause in writing why he should not be held in contempt of court for violation of appellate rule SCRA 1986, 12-208(A). Counsel has timely responded to the order to show cause. The order to show cause is hereby quashed. We do not, however, agree with counsel that he has not violated the rule.

Rule 12-208(A) states that trial counsel shall be responsible for preparing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases