FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
The Torrington Company, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
SKF USA Inc. and SKF (U.K.) Limited, Defendants-Intervenors.
RHP BEARINGS, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
The Torrington Company; Federal-Mogul Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors.
The TORRINGTON COMPANY, Plaintiff,
Federal-Mogul Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
SKF USA Inc. and SKF (U.K.) Limited, Defendants-Intervenors.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 31, 1992.
March 31, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frederick L. Ikenson, P.C., Frederick L. Ikenson, J. Eric Nissley, Joseph A. Perna, V and Larry Hampel, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor and defendant-intervenor Federal-Mogul Corp.
Stewart and Stewart, Eugene L. Stewart, Terence P. Stewart, James R. Cannon, Jr., William A. Fennell, Wesley K. Caine, Christopher J. Callahan, Myron A. Brilliant, Geert De Prest, Margaret E.O. Edozien, Robert A. Weaver and Amy S. Dwyer, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff, plaintiff-intervenor and defendant-intervenor The Torrington Co.
Covington & Burling, Harvey M. Applebaum, David R. Grace and Thomas O. Barnett, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff RHP Bearings, et al.
Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Velta A. Melnbrencis and Jane E. Meehan, Washington, D.C. (of counsel: Dean A. Pinkert, Atty.-Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce), for defendant U.S.
Howrey & Simon, Herbert C. Shelley, Scott A. Scheele, Alice A. Kipel and Thomas Trendl, Washington, D.C., for defendants-intervenors SKF USA Inc. and SKF (U.K.) Ltd.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION AND ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Defendant has moved to consolidate Court Nos. 91-07-00528, 91-08-00560 and 91-08-00570 under the name of Federal-Mogul Corporation v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-07-00528.
The Torrington Company ("Torrington") opposes the motion insofar as it would consolidate Court No. 91-08-00570, where Torrington is plaintiff, with the other cases at issue here. No other parties have responded to defendant's motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
